Aurèle Vasseur, Slot Tester

About This Tester and the Byline

The byline is a role, not a resume. The byline on Fruit King belongs to a narrow role. Play the title in the studio's own client in free-play mode, read the paytable and the rules screen end to end, then report only figures that Greentube, the game server or a public register has put on record. Aurèle tests one slot at a time and prints only what the game itself or a public register will back: opens the title in the maker's own demo client, reads the rules screen from the first line to the last so that the figure the catalogues leave out can be quoted, plays a logged session and records every balance the game server returns, does the arithmetic the maker leaves undone when a feature pays in coins rather than in a stated ceiling, reads the register of the market the reader lives in to say which games may legally be offered there and which may not, and looks the supplier up in every register that publishes one instead of taking a footer at its word.

Every page here is written, tested and signed by the same person. Corrections reach Aurèle Vasseur directly at editor@fruitkingslots.com: send the sentence you dispute with the document that contradicts it, and the reply comes from whoever wrote the line rather than from a support queue. A page that changes gets an update date beside its publication date, and the correction is named in it.

What sits behind the byline on this game is a record with dates, which is a different thing from a title. The demo was played on 2 November 2026: 93 paid spins at the 1.00 total bet the client opens on, a balance that moved from 500.00 to 789.00, and every balance the game server sent back written down. The paytable, the ten line patterns, the Cash Spins page and the full rules screen were read down to the version block, and all eighteen bet levels were read out of the client. Greentube's game page carries demo buttons, but its launcher returned an error when we tried it, so the game was reached through a public catalogue, and it loaded from the studio's test servers, which the address and the server's own greeting both show. The studio's game page and its full game index were saved to disk, so every figure here can be re-read instead of recalled. The supplier was looked up in more than one register: the UK file lists Greentube GmbH under account 41020, and has no record for the company the rules screen names as manufacturer.

What this byline does not claim is as short as what it does. No degree, no certification, no employer in the gambling industry: the credential on offer is the record above, and a reader who doubts it can repeat every step in an afternoon. No real-money play stands behind any page here, because none happened - the one recorded session ran on demo credits. No relationship exists with Greentube. The only tie to any casino is the affiliate link disclosed beside the play button, which may pay this site a commission and shapes no score. And we did not search a laboratory register for this title: the rules screen names a certification version, 1.303.0, and no laboratory.

In Short, What the Tester Signs

Here's the deal on this profile: it's a method, not a resume. Most figures on the 9 pages name, in the sentence itself, the screen or document they came from, and the schema names a role because a role is what can be verified today.

If a number isn't printed by the studio, the game or a regulator, the page says not confirmed and moves on. That's the whole promise, so the sections below simply show it working.

Role

Slot Tester

Focus

One slot, its maths and the screens its maker prints them on

Method

Demo first, paytable checked against the rules screen, sourced numbers

Scoring

1 to 10, across 5 named criteria for a game verdict

Writing since

2 Nov 2026

Contact

Editorial contact page

What Should You Check Before You Start?

Four checks are worth making before you start, and each one costs nothing. Open the rules screen inside the game first, then compare what it prints against what the studio publishes on its own page.

1. Read the rules screen to the end, where the return figure sits: this build prints 95.00%.
2. Look for a line that caps a round, and note that this build prints none.
3. Open the studio's own page for the game and see that it prints a volatility of 5 and no return at all.
4. Walk the bet panel to both stops, which is how you learn there are eighteen levels from 0.20 to 50.00 and no line-bet control.

All 9 pages here are dated, so a reader can tell when each check was last made. Doing this in advance turns the rest of this profile into a cross-check instead of a claim.

How This Tester Tests a Game

The tester starts every test in the free demo client, because a demo is the one place where a slot runs without a stake and without an operator account. Aurèle records each session and writes down the bet, the running balance and the outcome of every spin.

One recorded session stands behind every first-hand sentence here. The spin button went down 93 times at the 1.00 total bet the client starts on, and the balance moved from 500.00 to 789.00. That run finished well ahead, which is exactly why it is labelled an illustration wherever it appears rather than a measurement.

Only then does the tester read the studio's current game page, its full game index and the greeting its own server sends the client. Testing happens in play money, so nothing here describes a deposit, a withdrawal or anything a casino account does. That limitation is printed on every page it touches.

There is no seed-and-hash panel to re-check here, and no page pretends otherwise. This is a reel game whose rules say each round is independent and randomly determined, so a single spin cannot be recomputed by anyone. The tester records what the client prints and looks the studio up in every register that publishes one instead. The full procedure sits on the testing method page, which every review links from its byline.

5 Types of Check, Compared in a Table

No criterion outweighs another. Five criteria carry the same weight in every game verdict, and each one measures a separate thing, so a page states them instead of blending them into a mood. Return to player, rules transparency, the Cash Spins feature, the stake range and legal access all count the same, which makes the headline figure their plain average.

Which Score Means Play Again?

Seven out of 10 is the line where a game earns a replay. A score of 7 or higher means the tester would open the demo again. A score of 5 out of 10 or lower arrives with a named alternative, so a reader always has somewhere better to go.

The score appears in the first 100 words of a review and again in the verdict. A reader who stops early still leaves with the answer, which is the point of printing it twice.

What This Tester Covers, and Its Limits

This tester covers one game, and nothing else. Coverage stays deliberately narrow, and compared to a multi-game portal that is the whole point. The subject is this title and what surrounds it: a return printed only inside the game, a ceiling nobody prints, the coin feature and its four fixed bonuses, the two other games that share the name, and the registers its supplier can be checked in. Since 2026 that has produced 9 pages: 2 sections plus the front page.

The list of pages below runs in reading order. Start with the Fruit King review for the verdict, then move to the return reference page for the figure behind it. Greentube supplies the game, and it also supplies most figures this site checks, which is why the pages are built around the places where one of its screens disagrees with the next.

• Mechanics and controls, learned and recorded in the free demo.
• The bet grid, walked to both of its stops rather than copied from a specification.
• The supplier claim, checked in the registers that publish a file, and the manufacturer named on the rules screen looked up separately.
• The studio's own game page and its full game index, saved to disk so any figure can be re-read rather than recalled.
• The help that exists for a reader anywhere, read on each service's own site before it is printed.

The gaps in the public record are worth naming out loud, and several of them are real, so they are printed as problems instead of hidden.

Here is the shortlist a reader should carry. We did not search a laboratory register for this title, the studio's page prints no return, the client prints no ceiling, and the company the rules screen names as manufacturer has no record of its own in the UK register. Each of those gaps is printed where it applies.

What Is Verified, and What Is Not?

The verified list starts with the bet grid. It was read out of the client itself rather than copied from a specification: eighteen levels from 0.20 to 50.00, with no line-bet control in the game at all, because the ten lines are fixed and only the total moves.

The largest figures were verified on the screen itself. The Grand Bonus reads 2,500x the bet and fills only when all fifteen coin positions do; five sevens on one line pay 125x the bet. Anything larger, such as 1,250x if all ten lines closed on sevens, is arithmetic and is labelled as arithmetic.

The limits are just as real. A spin cannot be recomputed, we did not search a laboratory register for this title, and the rules print no odds for the Grand Bonus, so each of those stays an absence rather than an estimate. You will see each gap stated instead of smoothed over.

Pages This Tester Has Signed

The index below is generated from the database instead of typed by hand, so every one of the 9 content pages appears in it, each with its section and the date of its last edit. A page therefore cannot quietly drop out of the list.

A page that was merely rebuilt keeps its old date, because a build is not an edit. A page re-checked against a changed source gets a fresh date the same day, so you can tell one page from another at a glance.

Each page in the index carries its section beside it, and each links straight through to the work itself. A page edited this morning shows that date; a page merely rebuilt keeps the older one.

Every page above is a page the tester has read end to end, and no page enters the list until its sources are checked. The date shown on each page is the one of its own last edit.

Terms This Profile Uses

Return to player

The share of all stakes a game hands back over a modelled long run; this title prints 95.00% on the rules screen inside the game, and the studio's own page prints no figure.

Cash Spins

The one feature: six or more coins start three respins in which only coins land and stay, and each new coin resets the count to three.

Total bet

The only stake control here, from 0.20 to 50.00; the ten lines are fixed, so at 1.00 each line carries 0.10.

Not confirmed

The label printed whenever no studio page, game screen or public register states a figure the reader asked about.

Where the Maker Disagrees with Itself

The studio's page and its own client disagree about what to print. The page prints a volatility grade and no return; the client prints a return and no volatility. The table sets the surfaces beside one another instead of picking a winner.

The Sessions on Record

One recorded session stands behind every first-hand sentence on this site, and it ran on play money alone. Splitting it below separates what two rounds paid from what the rest of the run did.

What the Client Prints for Itself

The paytable and the rules screen print their own figures, and the tester copies them exactly as they appear. Every row in the table below comes off a screen we read ourselves.

Corrections, Contact and the Reply Rule

Corrections travel one way only. One page, one sentence and one document settle most of them. They go through the contact page: name the page, quote your sentence, attach the source you believe is right. If your source holds up, the page changes and its update date moves. Where two sources disagree, they are printed side by side, with a note on which one the studio stands behind.

1. Send the page URL and the exact sentence you dispute.
2. Attach the document that shows the correct value.
3. Give the date you read that document, because pages and screens move.
4. Say how you would like the reply addressed, by name or anonymously.

Readers who want the whole procedure should read how we test it and the terms of use. Read the responsible gambling page before you play anything; every page here is written for adults aged 18 or over.

Does a Demo Score Mean Anything?

A demo score means something narrow, and the page says so: it measures mechanics, rules transparency and how openly the ceiling is stated, and it never measures how a bankroll behaves under real pressure.

Readers who want the wider answer should read the limits above before the verdict below. A score summarises a pile of documents and one recorded session, and nothing beyond that.

Recap: What This Profile Promises

Two promises close this profile. If you want the short answer on any figure, the rules screen inside the running client is the better source, and it wins over a catalogue every time. Nothing reaches a reader that a document does not already carry. Coverage runs to 9 pages across 2 sections and the front page, and every one of them carries a byline and its publication date, with an update date beside it once the page is edited.

The weaknesses stay on the page beside the strengths, because a profile nobody could argue with is worth nothing. The about page explains where the money comes from, and why a commission leaves a score untouched.