About This Site, Its Sources and Its Funding

What These Pages Publish, and Why

Reviews, guides and reference explainers for one game fill these pages, and nothing else does. Every page names its primary sources: the studio's own page for the game, the rules screen inside the client read end to end, the paytable it prints, and the registers that publish a file anyone can download.

Some numbers stay out of reach. Figures that resist verification are printed as not confirmed instead of guessed at, because a reader deserves a visible gap rather than a number nobody can trace. Start with the Fruit King review, which is the clearest example of that rule working.

In Short, What a Reader Gets Here

Here's the short version: it's 9 pages about one game, and most figures name, in the sentence itself, the document they came from. We've no casino accounts, no deposits and no rankings for sale.

If a figure isn't printed by the studio, the game or a regulator, it doesn't go on a page. That's the entire editorial rule, and the sections below show how it holds up.

Subject

One slot game, Fruit King

Pages

9 across 2 sections and the front page

Publishing since

2 Nov 2026

Return quoted

95.00%, printed on the rules screen inside the game; the studio's own page prints none

Funding

Affiliate links, disclosed beside every sponsored button

Author

Aurèle Vasseur, slot tester

What Should You Check Before You Start?

Four checks are worth making before you start reading anywhere on this site, and they take a few minutes. The studio's page and its running game print different things, so the figures worth your attention are the ones each of them leaves out.

1. Open the rules screen in the game and note the return it prints, and that no line caps a round.
2. Open the studio's own page for the game and compare it with that screen: it prints a volatility grade and no return.
3. Open the list of licensed operators kept by the regulator where you live, and check any casino you are sent to against it.
4. Compare what the three documents say before you trust any summary.

The rules screen changes rarely; the studio's page and the regulator's list can move whenever they are updated. Explore the reference section for the detail behind each one, and note that all 9 pages carry the date of their most recent check.

Who Writes and Signs These Pages

Every page on Fruit King is written and signed by Aurèle Vasseur, the slot tester. Aurèle tests one slot at a time and prints only what the game itself or a public register will back: opens the title in the maker's own demo client, reads the rules screen from the first line to the last so that the figure the catalogues leave out can be quoted, plays a logged session and records every balance the game server returns, does the arithmetic the maker leaves undone when a feature pays in coins rather than in a stated ceiling, reads the register of the market the reader lives in to say which games may legally be offered there and which may not, and looks the supplier up in every register that publishes one instead of taking a footer at its word. The author profile sets out the method and lists all 9 published pages.

A byline and a date on every page. Each page carries its publication date, and an update date appears beside it as soon as the page is edited. The author profile sets out what stands behind that byline - the recorded session, the screens read and the register checks - and the person who tested the game is the person who answers a correction.

Where the Facts on These Pages Begin

Facts on these pages begin in 3 places, in a fixed order of source. First the game itself, tested in the studio's client with a recorded session. Then the studio's documents, its public game page and the rules text inside the client. Last the regulator registers, opened on the day a page is written to see what they carry.

The order matters because sources disagree more often than you would expect. On this game the studio's page and its own client disagree about what to print: the page gives a volatility grade and no return, the client gives the return and no volatility. They even describe the joker differently, and the client is the more precise of the two.

When that happens the page prints both and names who said what. Some catalogues add free spins, an expanding symbol and a double-up round that the rules never describe, so the page sets the surfaces side by side instead of choosing one. A studio can redraw a screen without saying so, which is why every figure carries the date it was checked.

What Is Checked Before a Page Goes Live?

Regulation is verified against a register instead of a logo. The UK file lists Greentube GmbH under account 41020 for gambling software, and has no record for Greentube Netherlands BV, the manufacturer on the rules screen. Whether a casino may offer the game where you live is a separate question, answered by the regulator of that country. Neither register names which casino runs which build.

Our testing method page describes each step in order. Third-party catalogues are read for context only, while competitor review sites stay out of the citation list entirely.

Which Sources Count, and Which Do Not?

The studio provides the client, and the screens inside it carry most of the figures these pages quote. Its rules screen is where the running build states its return, while the public game page states no return and no ceiling, so the two are cited separately.

Regulators supply the other half of the record here, and the useful question is which of them publish anything at all. A downloadable register answers in minutes; a register that answers no search leaves a footer claim standing as a footer claim; a regulator with no casino category leaves nothing to look up.

The gaps belong to the record, not to the reporting. We did not search a laboratory register for this title, the line that would cap a round exists in the rules template and did not reach the screen in the build we opened, and the rules print no odds for the Grand Bonus. You will find each of those problems printed wherever it matters to you.

3 Sources, Opened in Order

The complete list of steps is short. Our methodology lives on a page of its own: a game verdict rests on 5 criteria, and no casino is graded here at all, because no casino dossier was built; to verify a figure, we open the rules screen, the game page the studio publishes and the regulator register, in that order.

Readers get the result with their own route back to it. Most figures name the document they came from, so they can repeat the check for themselves, and you can hold a page to the standard it sets.

That standard carries one limitation worth stating out loud. A screen read last week can be redrawn this week, so you should treat the date beside a figure as part of the fact.

How This Service Earns Its Money

Money reaches this service in one way only. Some outbound links are affiliate links, and a reader who registers or deposits through one may pay this site a commission at no cost to themselves.

Commissions leave a rating, a verdict or the running order untouched, since operators are ranked nowhere on Fruit King at all. Compared to a paid placement, that is a dull business model, and no payment buys a line on this site. The terms of use repeat this disclosure, and it sits beside the sponsored button wherever one appears.

No operator or game studio pays for coverage, reads the text before publication or supplies their own screenshots. They see a finished page at the same moment you see it, and the published version is the only preview on offer. Frames come from the recorded demo session, and the studio has no say over a single caption.

Independence and Corrections on These Pages

Independence on these pages rests on 2 rules. Both are short enough to be held to, and both of them hold. A page is never edited at an operator request, and a correction is accepted only with a source a reader can open for themselves.

If you spot an error, write to the editor; your correction lands on the page and gives it an update date, so the history of a fact stays visible for you and for everyone after you. Where sources disagree, the page prints both figures and says which one the studio stands behind, because an averaged number is a made-up number.

Terms Used Across These Pages

Return to player

The share of all stakes a game hands back across a modelled long run, printed for this title as 95.00% on the rules screen inside the game and nowhere on the studio's own page.

Affiliate link

An outbound link that pays this site a commission when a reader registers, disclosed beside every sponsored button.

Licence register

The public list a regulator keeps, where a licence or account number can be looked up on the day a page is written.

Not confirmed

The wording used whenever no studio page, game screen or regulator entry states the figure a reader asked about.

Player Safety on These Pages

Safety comes first. Player safety outranks every other rule on this site, and it binds everyone who writes here. Every page is written for adults aged 18 or over, and a slot returns less over time than it collects.

The responsible gambling page is written for adults wherever they live. It sets out the limits to fix before playing, self-exclusion and free blocking software, and lists the warning signs worth acting on. It prints a helpline only where we have read it in a primary source.

Predictor and hack pages stay off Fruit King, because the rules say each round is independent and random, and no sequence a prediction could latch onto is published. The privacy policy explains that this service keeps no reader accounts and sets 0 cookies of its own.

Does a Commission Ever Change a Verdict?

No commission has ever moved a verdict here, and the structure makes it awkward to try: operators are never ranked, so there is no running order for money to buy.

A reader who doubts that can test it cheaply. Read the disclosure beside the sponsored button, then compare its wording with the criticism printed in the same section.

Recap: How These Pages Stay Honest

To recap the promise: these pages publish one game, name their sources, check a supplier against a register where one exists, and earn money through disclosed affiliate links that move no score. If you want one sentence, the rules screen inside the running game is always the better source. That is the rule. Player safety and the age rule sit above all of it.

The weak spots in the record stay visible as well. The studio's page prints no return, the client prints no ceiling, we did not search a laboratory register for the title, and the manufacturer named on the rules screen has no record of its own in the UK register, so each of those is printed where it belongs. Read how we test it next, then the author profile.